Season planning · capability

A season range that earns every option.

Option counts, depth, newness and price architecture — built from demand and the financial target, not last year plus a safety margin.

Planning·Season plan · LineLast sync · just now

Line plan

Option counts, depth, newness and price architecture — built from demand and the financial target.

Options in the line · SS26
412−18% vs LY · tail trimmed
38%New
62%Carry
240Depth
3Tiers
Options by category · derived from demand
80
Tops & Tees
62
Knitwear
54
Dresses
48
Wide-Leg Pants
Line plan · option · newness · depth
Trim tail ›
Wide-Leg Pants42% new48 opt
Knitwear35% new62 opt
Dresses28% new54 opt
The numbers behind it

Why the line plan decides the season's margin.

50%

Share of the line — the long tail — that drives under 10% of sales, carried for safety and cleared at markdown.

Source: Coresight industry research

14 pts

Full-price sell-through gap between retail leaders and the industry — range productivity is a big part of it.

Source: Incisiv × WRC × Anaplan 2026

+23%

Face the Future's full-price sell-through gain after the range was built to demand, not last year.

Source: Audited customer outcome

The problem today

What breaks before season planning runs to plan.

Planning·Line plan · SS27
Options planned
430
+18% vs LY
Unproductive tail
34%
of options · ~6% of sales
Capital in the tail
$3.2M
heading to markdown
Newness
38%
mix unmanaged
Full-price gap
14 pts
vs retail leaders
Option productivity · sales contribution by ranked option
ProductiveUnproductive tail
0%8%16%24%34% of options · ~6% of salescum. 100%options (ranked) →
The unproductive tail
Dresses96 options → 22% sold-throughtrim
Accessories88 options → 18%trim
Knitwear tail40 low-sellerscut
Carryover31 dead optionsclear
The tail no one trims
$3.2M
tied up in options that add cost and end the season in markdown
Diagnosis — the line is planned wide: a third of options drive a fraction of sales, add complexity, and end the season in markdownSource: Coresight markdown attribution 2024 · Incisiv × WRC × Anaplan benchmark
How Tightly does it

Three steps from demand to a line that earns every option.

Tightly · Line plan live· three stages from data to decisionLive
01Option plan
OPTIONS DERIVED · vs LYTops & Tees80was 96Knitwear62was 74Dresses54was 64Wide-Leg Pants48was 58

Breadth & depth from demand + target

Option counts and depth per category derived from the financial plan and the demand forecast — not last year. Every option has a reason to be in the line.

Options by category
02Architecture
NEWNESS vs CARRYOVERNew 38%Carryover 62%PRICE LADDER · GOOD / BETTER / BESTOpening$8932%Core$14848%Premium$22920%

Newness & price ladder, planned

Newness vs carryover and the good / better / best price ladder set explicitly per category, against what the customer actually buys.

Newness 38% · 3 tiers
03Trim & tie
OPTION CONTRIBUTION · SCOREDSalmon Wide-Leg$1.4MkeepPop Tapered$0.9MkeepCoral Wide-Leg$0.1MtrimVelour Trouser$0.08MtrimTail trimmed · line reconciled to OTB

Tail trimmed, tied to the buy

Every option scored on expected contribution. The unproductive tail is flagged with the capital it ties up, and the line reconciles to open-to-buy.

Tail trimmed · tied to OTB
See it run

The line, built to the plan.

Options, depth, newness and price tiers per category — derived from demand and the financial target, with the unproductive tail flagged before the buy.

  • Option counts derived from demand + target
  • Newness and price ladder planned per category
  • Unproductive tail flagged before the buy commits
Line plan· SeasonSS26 · all categoriesBuilt to demand · live
Options
412
−18% vs LY
Newness
38%
planned per category
Avg depth
240
units / option
FP sell-through
92%
ahead of plan
18 options flagged as unproductive tailCapital freed $3.2MTrim tail →
Line plan · by category
options · newness · depth · tier · plan
CategoryOptionsNew%DepthTop tierPlanned
Tops & Tees8041%280Core$25M
Knitwear6235%240Core$18M
Wide-Leg Pants4842%260Premium$22M
Dresses5428%180Core$14M
Accessories9622%320Opening$11M
Reconciled to OTB · 412 of 430 options keptNewness & tiers planned per category
Your agents

Meet your Line-planning agent

Proposes the option plan from demand and the financial target, and flags the unproductive tail before the buy is written.

Meet the agents
Tightly agent
just now · within your limits
Live

Re-forecast ready — 3 categories have drifted from plan this week. Want me to stage the moves for your review?

Drifted vs plan · this weekΔ wmape
Tailored Trousers+9%8%
Woolly Layers−12%11%
Activewear+5%9%
Rebalance 240u DC → SFRe-baseline OTB Q3Hold buy on OCN-072
Stage movesReview firstLogged · audit ready
Customer outcome
We were carrying 40% more options than we needed. Building the line to demand cut the tail and put the buy behind what actually sells.
Face the Future
Mark Till
MD, Face the Future
+23%

Full-price sell-through (audited)

What this replaces

The line you build today, and the one Tightly delivers.

Today · the line only grows
Options in the lineLY → this season
past
LY
486
41%
never hit plan
LY + paddingnewness ad-hoctiers implicittail at markdown

Breadth is carried over and padded “to be safe.” The line only grows — and the tail it grows is discovered at markdown.

Tightly · line built to the plan
Options · built to demand
412−18% · tail trimmed
Productive
92%
Newness38% · planned per category
Price ladderOpening / Core / Premium
Reconciled toOTB + financial plan

The line is built to demand and the target — productive breadth, newness and price tiers explicit, the tail trimmed before the buy commits.

FAQ

Questions buyers ask, answered straight.

Something not covered here? Talk to the team.

How is this different from assortment planning?

Season / line planning sets the shape of the range — how many options per category, at what depth, how much newness, at which price tiers. Assortment planning takes that range and decides which options go to which channels, clusters and doors. One builds the line; the other distributes it.

How do you decide the right number of options?

Options are derived from the financial plan and the demand forecast per category — the breadth and depth that hit the sales and margin target without carrying a tail that won't sell. You set the guardrails; the model proposes, you adjust.

Can we control newness vs carryover?

Yes — newness is a planned input per category, not an accident of the buy. Set a target mix and the line plan holds to it, flagging where carryover is crowding out new options or vice-versa.

Does it respect our price architecture?

Opening / core / premium tiers are explicit in the plan. The line is built to the ladder you set, and gaps or over-coverage in a tier surface before the buy.

How does the tail get trimmed?

Every option is scored on its expected contribution against the plan. The unproductive tail is flagged with the capital it ties up, so you cut it before the buy — not after, at markdown.

A line that earns its options. Build the range to demand, and trim the tail before the buy.

There's nothing to rip out. Tightly runs on your existing ERP, EDI, e-commerce and POS. Give us 30 minutes and we'll show it on your own categories.